内蒙古呼和浩特市2026届高三年级第一次教学质量监测英语试题

2025-08-25 15:33:26 1

内蒙古呼和浩特市2026届高三年级第一次教学质量监测英语试题，目前2025-2026衡水金卷答案网已经汇总了内蒙古呼和浩特市2026届高三年级第一次教学质量监测英语试题的各科答案和试卷，获取更多{{papers_name}}答案解析，请在关注本站。

本文从以下几个角度介绍。

3. What does Hyman focus on in the last paragraph? A. The working principle behind our brains.答案解析网B. Examples of how to pass time quickly. 答案解析网C. The application of the finding in daily lives.答案解析网D. Comments on the research on time perception.答案解析网B 答案解析网zut Using trees as a cost-effective tool against climate change is more complicated than simplyplanting large numbers of them, an international research team has found, which includesJacob Bukoski from the College of Forestry of the Oregon State University and seven otherresearchers.答案解析网“Trees can play a role in climate change mitigation(缓解), for multiple reasons," Bukoskisaid. “It's pretty easy to understand that forests pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere andstore it. This study brings a different insight into the whole ‘Should we plant trees to solveclimate change？’debate.答案解析网Expanding forests globally has been widely proposed as a key tactic against climatechange since forests can store atmospheric carbon dioxide in their biomass and soils. Harvestedtrees can also store carbon in the form of wood products.答案解析网srlw"There are two basic approaches to forest expansion," Bukoski said. “Generally speaking, wecan let forests regenerate on their own, which is slow but cheap, or take a more activeapproach and plant them, which speeds up growth but is more expensive. 答案解析网The researchers collected data from thousands of reforestation sites in 130 countries andcompared the two approaches across reforestable landscapes in low- and middle-incomecountries, identifying where naturally regenerating or planting forests is likely to make moresense. They found that natural regeneration would be most cost-effective over a 30-year periodfor 46% of the areas studied, and planting would be most cost-effective for 54%. They alsodetermined that using a combination of the two approaches across all areas would be 44%better than natural regeneration alone and 39 % better than planting by itself."If the objective is to remove carbon from the air as quickly and as cheaply as possible,the best option is a mix of both naturally regenerating forests and planting forests," Bukoski said. The authors of the study add that carbon is just one consideration when growing trees.Biodiversity, demand for wood products, support of local livelihoods, and non-carbon biophysicaleffects must also be considered when deciding where and how to reforest landscapes.4. Which of the following can best replace the underlined word “tactic" in paragraph 3?A. Context.B. Mistake.C. Strategy.D. Consequence.B. Time-consuming. 答案解析网A. Cost-ineffective. C. Environment-unfriendly.D. Short-lived. 答案解析网6. What are the study authors′ advice on planting trees? 答案解析网A. Take action immediately.B. Think about various factors.C. Make use of carbon.D.Seek financial support.答案解析网7.Which of the following topics does the text most probably belong to?答案解析网: A. Using trees to fight climate change.vob oyB. Planting trees in different countries. C. Replacing planting with regenerating. gss or D. Selecting areas for expanding forests.【2026届高考考点滚动提升卷·英语（六）第2页（共4页）】

本文标签：

【在小程序中打开】